Sellado Dentinario Inmediato: debe ser un procedimiento de rutina en las restauraciones adheridas indirectas?
Ernesto Borgia Botto
Práctica privada. Montevideo, Uruguay.
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9888-4128
PDF
PDF en inglés (English)

Palabras clave

agentes adhesivos a dentina, materiales biocompatibles, materiales dentales, restauraciones dentales permanentes, estudios clínicos.

Cómo citar

Borgia Botto, E. (2023). Sellado Dentinario Inmediato: debe ser un procedimiento de rutina en las restauraciones adheridas indirectas?. Odontoestomatología, 25(41), 21. Recuperado a partir de https://www.odon.edu.uy/ojs/index.php/ode/article/view/573
PDF
PDF en inglés (English)

Resumen

Resumen
Objetivos: Evaluar los resultados biomecánicos, biológicos, técnicos y clínicos de la técnica del Sellado Dentinario Inmediato.
Metodología: Una Revisión Crítica de la Literatura fue llevada a cabo, para discutir los resultados de estudios clínicos, de laboratorio y revisiones sistemáticas, a fin de responder la pregunta del título.
Resultados: Los resultados clínicos, biomecánicos y biológicos fueron variados, pero a mediano y largo plazo no mostraron diferencias significativas entre el Sellado Dentinario Inmediato y el Sellado Dentinario Diferido. Por otra parte, la técnica es más compleja e insume más tiempo clínico.
Discusión: De acuerdo con la evaluación de los resultados mencionados, el Sellado Dentinario Inmediato no tuvo los niveles de eficacia y eficiencia esperados. Conclusiones: Hasta el momento, el Sellado Dentinario Inmediato justificaría su aplicación en situaciones específicas y no como procedimiento de rutina en la realización de restauraciones indirectas adheridas.

PDF
PDF en inglés (English)

Citas

1. Diccionario de la lengua española 2021; dlrae.es.
2. da Silva Modena KC, Casas-Apayco LC, Atta MT, de Souza Costa CA, Hebling J, Sipert CR et al. Cytotoxicity and Biocompatibility of direct and Indirect Pulp Capping Materials. J Appl Oral Sci. 2009 Dec; 17(6): 544–554.
3. Schwendicke F, Frencken JE, Bjørndal L, Maltz M, Manton DJ, Ricketts D, et al. Managing Carious Lesions: Consensus Recommendations on Caries Tissue Removal. Adv Dent Res 2016 May;28(2):58- 67. doi: 10 1177/0022034516639271.
4. Borgia Botto E, Barón R, Borgia JL. Pulp response of 160 indirect pulp protections: retrospective clinical study between 5 and 18 years (in Spanish). RODYB 2020;2:24-32.
5. Khokhar M, Tewari S. Outcomes of Partial and Complete Caries Excavation in Permanent Teeth: A 18 Month Clinical Study. Contemp Clin Dent. 2018;9:468-473.
6. Schwendicke F, Stolpe M, Meyer-Lueckel H, Paris S, Dörfer CE. Cost-effectiveness of one- and twostep incomplete and complete excavations. J Dent Res 2013;92(10):880-887.
7. Maltz M, Henz SL, de Oliveira EF, Jardim JJ. Conventional caries removal and sealed caries in permanent teeth: A microbiological evaluation. J of Dent. 2012; 40:776-782.
8. Bjorndal L, Reit C, Bruun G, Markvart M, Kjældgaard M, Nasman P, et al. Treatment of deep caries lesions in adults: randomized clinical trials comparing stepwise vs. direct complete excavation, and direct pulp capping vs. partial pulpotomy. Eur J Oral Sci 2010; 118: 290–297.
9. Maltz M, García R, Jardim JJ, de Paula LM, Yamaguti PM, Moura MS, et al. Randomized trial of Partial vs. Stepwise caries removal: 3-year follow-up. J Dent Res. 2012; 11:1026-1031.
10. Maltz M, Koppe B, Jardim JJ, Alves LS, de Paula LM, Yamaguti PM, et al. Partial caries removal in deep caries lesions: a 5-year multicenter randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2018;22:1337-1343.
11. Pashley DH. Consideration of dentin permeability in cytotocixity testing. Int Endod J. 1988; 21:143–154.
12. Putzeys E , Duca RC , Coppens L , Vanoirbeek J , Godderis L , Van Meerbeek B, et al. In-vitro transdentinal diffusion of monomers from adhesives. J Dent. 2018 Aug;75: 91-97.doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2018.05.023. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
13. Ratanasathien S, Wataha JC, Hanks CT, Dennison JB. Cytotoxic interactive effects of dentin bonding components on mouse fibroblasts. J Dent Res. 1995; 74:1602-6.
14. de Souza Costa CA , Teixeira HM, Lopes do Nascimento AB, Hebling J. Biocompatibility of resinbased dental materials applied as liners in deep cavities prepared in human teeth. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2007 Apr;81(1):175-84. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.30651.
15. Corralo DJ, Maltz M. Clinical and Ultrastructural Effects of Different Liners/Restorative Materials on Deep Carious Dentin: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Caries Res 2013; 47:243–250.
16. Duque C, Negrini T de C, Sacono NT, Spolidorio DM, de Souza Costa CA, Hebling J. Clinical and microbiological performance of resin-modified glass-ionomer liners after incomplete dentine caries removal. Clin Oral Investig 2009; 13:465-71.
17. Wang Z. Bioceramic materials in Endodontics. Endodontic Topics 2015; 3:3-30.
18. Dias Ribeiro AP, Tomoko Sacono N , Soares DG, Alves Ferreira Bordini E, de Souza Costa CA, Hebling J. Human pulp response to conventional and resin-modified glass ionomer cements applied in very deep cavities. Clin Oral Investig 2020 May;24(5): 1739-1748.doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-03035-3. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
19. Mathur VP, Dhillon JK, Logani A, Kalra G. Evaluation of indirect pulp capping using three different materials: A randomized control trial using cone-beam computed tomography. Indian J Dent Res. 2016;27(6):623-629.
20. Petrou MA, Alhamoui FA, Welk A, Altarabulsi MB, Alkilzy M, H Splieth C. A randomized clinical trial on the use of medical Portland cement, MTA and calcium hydroxide in indirect pulp treatment. Clin Oral Investig 2014;18(5):1383-9.
21. Hashem D, Mannocci F, Patel S, Manoharan A, Brown JE, Watson TF, et al. Clinical and radiographic assessment of the efficacy of calcium silicate indirect pulp capping: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Dent Res. 2015;94(4):562-8.
22. Koubi G, Colon P, Franquin J-C, Hartmann A, Richard G, Faure M-O, et al. Clinical evaluation of the performance and safety of a new dentine substitute, Biodentine, in the restoration of posterior teeth —a prospective study. Clin Oral Investig 2013; 17(1): 243–249.
23. Abu-Nawareg MM, Zidan AZ, Zhou J Agee K, Chiba A, Tagami J, et al. Adhesive sealing of dentin surfaces in vitro: A review. Am J Dent. 2015 Dec; 28(6): 321–332.
24. Magne P. Immediate dentin sealing: a fundamental procedure for indirect bonded restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2005;17(3):144-54.
25. Magne P. IDS: Immediate dentin sealing for tooth preparations. J Adhes Dent 2014; 16:594.
26. López Jordi MC, Piovesan S, Patrón C. Orientaciones para realizar una Monografía de Revisión. Facultad de Odontología (UdelaR); Departamento de Publicaciones; Uruguay; Agosto 2016.
27. Grant M, Brooth A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal 2009; 26: 91-108.
28. Christiani JJ, Devecchi JR. Materiales para restauraciones provisorias. Actas Odontológicas 2017; 1:28-32.
29. Leesungbok R, Lee SM, Park SJ, Lee SW, Lee DY, Im BJ, et al. The effect of IDS (immediate dentin sealing) on dentin bond strength under various thermocycling periods. J Adv Prosthodont. 2015 Jun;7(3):224-32.
30. Magne P, So WS, Cascione D. Immediate dentin sealing supports delayed restoration placement. J Prosthet Dent. 2007 Sep;98(3):166-74.
31. Gresnigt MM, Cune MS, de Roos JG, Özcan M. Effect of immediate and delayed dentin sealing on the fracture strength, failure type and Weilbull characteristics of lithiumdisilicate laminate veneers. Dent Mater. 2016 Apr;32(4):73-81.
32. Ishii N, Maseki T, Nara Y. Bonding state of metal-free CAD/CAM onlay restoration after cyclic loading with and without immediate dentin sealing. Dent Mater. 2017 May 31;36(3):357-367.
33. Hironaka NGL, Ubaldini ALM, Sato F, Giannini M, Terada RSS, Pascotto RC. Influence of immediate dentin sealing and interim cementation on the adhesion of indirect restorations with dualpolymerizing resin cement. J Prosthet Dent. 2018 Apr;119(4): 678.e1-678.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent. 2018.02.001.
34. Qanungo A, Aras MA, Chitre V, Mysore A, Amin B, Daswani SR. Immediate dentin sealing for indirect bonded restorations. J Prosthodont Res. 2016 Oct;60(4):240-249.
35. Kolanko J , Bonsor S Does Immediate Dentine Sealing Improve Bonding Effectiveness of Glass Ceramic Restorations Compared to Delayed Dentine Sealing? Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2021 Nov 16. doi: 10.1922/EJPRD_2299 Kolanko11. Online ahead of print.
36. Hardan L, Devoto W, Bourgi R, Cuevas-Suárez CE, Lukomska-Szymanska M, Fernández-Barrera M A, et al. Immediate Dentin Sealing for Adhesive Cementation of Indirect Restorations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Gels. 2022 Mar 11;8(3): 175.doi: 10.3390/gels8030175.
37. Dalby R, Ellakwa A, Millar B, Martin FE. Influence of immediate dentin sealing on the shear bond strength of pressed ceramic luted to dentin with self-etch resin cement. Int J Dent. 2012;2012:310702. doi: 10.1155/2012/310702. Epub 2012 Jan 12.
38. Ferreira-Filho RC, Ely C, Amaral RC, Rodrigues JA, Roulet JF, Cassoni A, et al. Effect of Different Adhesive Systems Use for Immediate Dentin Sealing on Bond Strength of a Self-Adhesive Resin Cement to Dentin. Oper Dent. 2018 Jul/Aug;43(4):391-397.
39. Falkensammer F, Arnetzl GV, Wildburger A, Krall C, Freudenthaler J. Influence of different conditioning methods on immediate and delayed dentin sealing. J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Aug;112(2):204-10.
40. Santana VB, de Alexandre RS, Rodrigues JA, Ely C, Reis AF. Effects of Immediate Dentin Sealing and Pulpal Pressure on Resin Cement Bond Strength and Nanoleakage. Oper Dent. 2016 Mar- Apr;41(2):189-99.
41. Bacchi A, Abuna G, Babbar A, Sinhoreti MA, Feitosa VP. Influence of 3-month Simulated Pulpal Pressure on the Microtensile Bond Strength of Simplified Resin Luting Systems. J Adhes Dent. 2015 Jun;17(3):265-71.
42. Rêgo H, Alves TS, Bresciani E B, Niu l, Tay FR, Pucci CR. Can long-term dentine bonding created in real life be forecasted by parameters established in the laboratory? SciRep.2016;6: 37799.doi:10.1038/srep37799.
43. Carvalho RM, Manso AP, Geraldeli S, Tay FR, Pashley DH. Durability of bonds and clinical success of adhesive restorations. Dent Mater 2012; 1:72-86.
44. Mazzoni A, Tjäderhane L, Checchi V, Di Lenarda R, Salo T, Tay FR, et al. Role of Dentin MMPs in Caries Progression and Bond Stability. J Dent Res. 2015 Feb; 94(2): 241–251.
45. Tjäderhane T. Dentin Bonding: Can we make it last? Oper Dent. 2015; 1:4-18.
46. Sabatini C, Pashley DH. Aging of adhesive interfaces treated with benzalkonium chloride and benzalkonium methacrylate. Eur J Oral Sci. 2015 Apr; 123(2): 102–107.
47. Ya-Ping Gou , Meghil M M, Pucci CR, Breschi L , Pashley DH, Cutler WC, et al. Optimizing resindentin bond stability using a bioactive adhesive with concomitant antibacterial properties and antiproteolytic activities. Acta Biomater 2018 Jul 15; 75:171-182.
48. da Silva Nunes Gomes Miranda ME, Moreira da Silva E, Flôres de Oliveira M, Simmer FS, Botelho dos Santos G, Amaral CM. Resin-dentin bond stability of etch-and-rinse adhesive systems with different concentrations of MMP inhibitor GM1489. J Appl Oral Sci. 2020; 28: e20190499. Published online 2020 Apr 27. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2019-0499
49. Yamauchi S, Wang X, Egusa H, Sun J. High-Performance Dental Adhesives Containing an Ether- Based Monomer. J Dent Res. 2020 Feb; 99(2): 189–195.Published online 2019 Dec 20. doi: 10.1177/0022034519895269
50. Brigagão VC, Barreto LFD, Gonçalves KAS, Amaral M, Vitti RP, Neves ACC, et al. Effect of interim cement application on bond strength between resin cements and dentin: Immediate and delayed dentin sealing. J Prosthet Dent. 2017 Jun;117(6):792-798.
51. Khayashi K, Maeno M, Nara Y. Influence of immediate dentin sealing and temporary restoration on the bonding of CAD/CAM ceramic crown restoration. Dental Mater Journal 2019; (38);6: 970-980.
52. Guilardi LF, Dapieve KS, Giordan JC, Susin AH, Valandro LF, Rippe MP. Effect of immediate dentin sealing and temporary cement removal on bond strength of resin cements to dentin. Braz Dent Sci 2022 Jan/Mar;25 (1): e2729; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4322/bds.2022.e2729
53. Sarac D, Bulucu B, Sarac YS, Kulunk S. The effect of dentin-cleaning agents on resin cement bond strength to dentin. J Am Assoc 2008; 6:751-758.
54. Stavridakis MM, Krejci I, Magne P. Immediate dentin sealing of onlay preparations: thickness of precured dentin bonding agent and effect of surface cleaning. Op Dent 2005; 6:747-757.
55. Özcan M, Lamperti S. Effect of mechanical and air-particles cleansing protocols of provisional cement on immediate dentin sealing layer and subsequent adhesion of resin composite cement. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 2015; 24:2731-2743.
56. Oliveira L, Mota EG, Borges GA, Burnett LH Jr, Spohr AM. Influence of immediate dentin sealing techniques on cuspal deflection and fracture resistance of teeth restored with composite resin inlays. Oper Dent. 2014 Jan-Feb;39(1):72-80.
57. Saadeddin N, Ali Al-Khalil M, Al-Adel O. Effect of immediate dentin sealing on the fracture strength of lithium disilicate ceramic onlays. Swiss Dent J. 2022 Apr 28;132. Online ahead of print
58. Sasse M, Krummel A, Klosa K, Kern M. Influence of restoration thickness and dental bonding surface on the fracture resistance of full-coverage occlusal veneers made from lithium disilicate ceramic. Dent Mater. 2015 Aug;31(8): 907-15.doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.04.017. Epub 2015 Jun 4
59. van den Breemer CRG, Özcan M, Cune MS, van der Giezen R, Kerdijk W, Gresnigt MMM. Effect of immediate dentine sealing on the fracture strength of lithium disilicate and multiphase resin composite inlay restorations. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2017 Aug;72:102-109.
60. Gresnigt MMM, Cune MS, de Roos JG, Özcan M. Effect of immediate and delayed dentin sealing on the fracture strength, failure type and Weilbull characteristics of lithium disilicate laminate veneers. Dent Mater. 2016 Apr;32(4): e73-81.
61. Bottino MA, Campos F, Ramos NC, Rippe MP, Valandro LF, Melo RM. Inlays made from a hybrid material: adaptation and bond strengths. Oper Dent. 2015; 40: 83-91.
62. Frankenberger R, Hartmann VE, Krech M, Krämer N, Reich S, Braun A, et al. Adhesive luting of new CAD/CAM materials. Int J Comput Dent. 2015; 18: 9-20.
63. Wolfart S, Wegner SM, Kern M.. Comparison of using calcium hydroxide or a dentine primer for reducing dentinal pain following crown preparation: a randomized clinical trial with an observation time up to 30 months. J Oral Rehabil 2004 Apr;31(4):344-50.
64. Jalalian E, Meraji N, Mirzaei M. .A comparison of the efficacy of potassium nitrate and Gluma desensitizer in the reduction of hypersensitivity in teeth with full-crown preparations. J Contemp Dent Pract 2009 Jan 1;10(1):66-73.
65. Marto CM, Baptista Paula A, Nunes T, Pimenta M, Abrantes AM, Pires AS, et al. Evaluation of the efficacy of dentin hypersensitivity treatments-A systematic review and follow-up analysis. J Oral Rehabil. 2019 Oct;46(10):952-990.
66. Hu J, Zhu Q. Effect of immediate dentin sealing on preventive treatment for postcementation hypersensitivity. Int J Prosthodont. 2010 Jan-Feb;23(1):49-52.
67. van den Breemer CRG, Gresnigt MMM, Özcan M, Kerdijk W, Cune MS. Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial on the Survival of Lithium Disilicate Posterior Partial Crowns Bonded Using Immediate or Delayed Dentin Sealing: Short-term Results on Tooth Sensitivity and Patient Satisfaction. Oper Dent. Sep/Oct 2019;44(5): E212-E222. doi: 10.2341/18-047-C.
68. Josic U, Sebold M, Lins RBE, Savovic J, Mazzitelli C, Maravic T, et al. Does immediate dentin sealing influence postoperative sensitivity in teeth restored with indirect restorations? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Esthet Restor Dent 2021;1-10; https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12841
69. Cavalheiro A, Vargas MA, Armstrong SR, Dawson DV, Gratton DG. Effect of incorrect primer application on dentin permeability. J Adhes Dent 2006 Dec;8(6):393-400.
70. van den Breemer CRG, Cune MS, Özcan M, Naves LZ, Kerdijk W, Gresnigt MMM. Randomized clinical trial on the survival of lithium disilicate posterior partial restorations bonded using immediate or delayed dentin sealing after 3 years of function J Dent. 2019 Jun; 85:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j. jdent.2019.02.001. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
71. Gresnigt MMM, Cune MS, Schuitemaker J, van der Made SPM, Meisberger EW, Magne P,et al. Performance of ceramic laminate veneers with immediate dentine sealing: An 11-year prospective clinical trial. Dent Mater. 2019 Jul;35(7): 1042-1052.doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2019.04.008. Epub 2019 May 10.
72. Van den Breemer CRG, Buijs GJ, Cune MS, Özcan M, Kerdijk W, Van der Made S, et al. Prospective clinical evaluation of 765 partial glass-ceramic posterior restorations luted using photo-polymerized resin composite in conjunction with immediate dentin sealing. Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Mar;25(3):1463-1473. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03454-7. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
73. van den Breemer CRG, Gresnigt MMM , Cune MS. Cementation of Glass-Ceramic Posterior Restorations: A Systematic Review. Biomed Res Int. 2015; 2015:148954. doi: 10.1155/2015/148954. Epub 2015 Oct 18.
74. Samartzi T-K, Papalexopoulos D, Sarafianou A, Kourtis S. Inmediate Dentin Sealing: A Literature Review. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent 2021 Jun 21;13: 233-256.doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S307939. eCollection 2021.
75. Borgia E, Baron R, Borgia JL. Clinical performance of bonded ceramic inlays/onlays: A 5- to 18-year retrospective longitudinal study. Am J Dent. 2016;29:187-192.
76. Frankenberger R, Taschner M, García-Godoy F, Petschelt A, Krämer N. Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after 12 years. J. Adhes Dent 2008; 10:393-398.
77. Guess PC, Selz CF, Steinhart YN, Stampf S, Strub JR. Prospective clinical split-mouth study of pressed and CAD/CAM all-ceramic partial-coverage restorations: 7-year results. Int J Prosthodont 2013;
26:21-25.
78. Galiatsatos AA, Bergou D. Six-year clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays and onlays. Quintessence Int 2008; 39:407-412.
79. Santos MJ, Mondelli RF, Navarro MF, Francischone CE, Rubo JH, Santos GC Jr. Clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays and onlays fabricated with two systems: five-year follow-up. Oper Dent 2013; 38:3-11.
80. Beier US, Kapferer I, Burtscher D, GIesinger JM, Dumfahrt H. Clinical performance of all-ceramic inlay and onlay restorations in posterior teeth. Int J Prosthodont 2012;25: 395-402.
81. Collares K, Corrêa MB, Laske M, Kramer E, Reiss B, Moraes RR, et al. A practice-based research network on the survival of ceramic inlay/onlay restorations. Dent Mater. 2016 May;32:687-94.
82. Archibald JJ, Santos GC Jr, Moraes Coelho Santos MJ. Retrospective clinical evaluation of ceramic onlays placed by dental students. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;119:743-748.
83. Mobilio N, Fasiol A, Catapano S. Survival Rates of Lithium Disilicate Single Restorations: A Retrospective Study. Int J Prosthodont. 2018; 31:283-286.
84. van den Breemer CR, Vinkenborg C, van Pelt H, Edelhoff D, Cune MS. The Clinical Performance of Monolithic Lithium Disilicate Posterior Restorations After 5, 10, and 15 Years: A Retrospective Case Series. Int J Prosthodont. 2017;30:62-65.
85. Schulz P., Johansson A., Arvidson K.- A retrospective study of Mirage ceramic inlays over up to 9 years. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16(5):510-514.
86. Murgueitio R, Bernal G.- Three-year clinical follow-up of posterior teeth restored with leucite-reinforced IPS Empress onlays and partial veneer crowns. J Prosthodont. 2012;21:340-5.
87. Lange R.T., Pfeiffer P.- Clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays compared to composite restorations. Oper Dent. 2009; 34:263-272.
88. van DIjken JW., Hasseirot L.- A prospective 15-year evaluation of extensive dentin-enamel-bonding pressed ceramic coverages. Dent Mater 2010;26: 929-939.
89. Fabianelli A, Goracci C, Bertelli E, Davidson CL, Ferrari M A clinical trial of Empress II porcelain inlays luted to vital teeth with a dual-curing adhesive system and a self-curing resin cement. J Adhes
Dent 2006; 8:427-31.
90. Aslan YU, Coskun E, Ozkan Y, Dard M. Clinical Evaluation of Three Types of CAD/CAM Inlay/ Onlay Materials After 1-Year Clinical Follow Up. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2019;27:131-140.
91. Otto T. Up to 27-years clinical long-term results of chairside Cerec 1 CAD/CAM inlays and onlays. Int J Comput Dent. 2017;20:315-329.
92. Malament KA, Margvelashvili-Malament M, Natto ZS, Van Thompson, Rekow D, Att W. Comparison of 16.9-year survival of pressed acid etched e.max lithium disilicate glass ceramic complete and partial coverage restorations in posterior teeth: Performance and outcomes as a function of tooth position, age, sex, and thickness of ceramic material. J Prosthet Dent. 2020 Sep30; S00223913(20) 304510. doi: 100000.1016/j.prosd, ent.2020.08.013. Online ahead of print.
93. Ghiggi PC, Steiger AK, Marcondes ML, Mota EG, Burnett LH Júnior, et al. Does immediate dentin sealing influence the polymerization of impression materials? Eur J Dent. 2014 Jul;8(3):366-72.
94. Magne P, Nielsen B. Interactions between impression materials and immediate dentin sealing. J Prosthet Dent. 2009 Nov;102(5):298-305.
95. Khakiani MI, Kumar VK, Hemal V Pandya HV, Nathani TI, Verma P, et al. Effect of Immediate Dentin Sealing on Polymerization of Elastomeric Materials: An Ex Vivo Randomized Controlled Trial Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. Jul-Aug 2019;12(4):288-292. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1657.
96. Ashy LM, Marghalani H, Silikas N. In Vitro Evaluation of Marginal and Internal Adaptations of Ceramic Inlay Restorations Associated with Immediate vs Delayed Dentin Sealing Techniques. Int J Prosthodont 2020;33(1):48-55. doi: 10.11607/ijp.6372.