Palabras clave
Incrustaciones intracoronarias
molar
premolar
evidencia científica
restauraciones adheridas
operatoria dental mínimamente invasiva
molar
premolar
evidencia científica
restauraciones adheridas
operatoria dental mínimamente invasiva
Cómo citar
Estudio clínico retrospectivo, de 656 restauraciones de oro colado en dientes posteriores, entre 5 y 44 años:: Análisis de los resultados. (2018). Odontoestomatología, 20(31). https://www.odon.edu.uy/ojs/index.php/ode/article/view/247
Resumen
Objetivos. 1) Evaluar el rendimiento clínico de las restauraciones posteriores de oro, durante 44 años; 2) Analizar su indicación y distribución, en relación con la evolución de la evidencia científica. Materiales y Métodos. En 100 pacientes, se estudiaron 656 restauraciones posteriores de oro colado. De 2552 pacientes registrados, 210 cumplieron los requisitos de inclusión. La muestra estadística representativa fue de 136 pacientes. Se seleccionaron al azar 140 y se estudiaron 138. Doce variables fueron analizadas. El procesamiento de datos se realizó con el software Epidat, versión 3.1 y del software SPSS versión 13.0. Resultados. Estaban en función 536 (81.7%) y 120 (18.3%) fracasaron. Según el Método de Kaplan-Meier, la sobrevida total estimada fue de 77.4% a los 39 años y 10 meses. Conclusiones. La constante actualización del conocimiento, responsabilidad ética del profesional, le permitirá introducir los cambios conceptuales y clínicos a la luz de las nuevas evidencias científicas.
Referencias
1. Arlan CV, Dimitriu B, Arlan VV, Bodnar D, Suciu I. Current opinions concerning the restoration of endodontically treated teeth: basic principles. J Med Life 2009;15:165-172.
2. Demarco FF, Corrêa MB, Cenci MS, et al. Longevity of posterior composite restorations: Not only a matter of materials. Dent Mater 2012;28:87-101.
3. Stoll R, Sieweke M, Pieper K, Stachniss V, Schulte A. Longevity of cast gold inlays and partial crowns--a retrospective study at a dental school. Clin Oral Investig. 1999;2:100-104.
4. Studer SP, Wettstein F, Lehner C, Zullo TG, Schärer P. Long-term survival estimates of cast gold inlays and onlays with their analysis of failures. J Oral Rehabil. 2000;6:461-472.
5. Donovan T.E., Chee W.W.- Conservative indirect restorations for posterior teeth. Cast versus bonded ceramic. Dent Clin North Am. 1993;3:433-443.
6. Donovan T., Simonsen R.J., Guertin G., Tucker R.V.- Retrospective clinical evaluation of 1314 cast gold restorations in service from 1 to 52 years. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2004;3:194-204.
7. Beier US, Kapferer I, Burtscher D, GIesinger JM, Dumfahrt H. Clinical performance of all-ceramic inlay and onlay restorations in posterior teeth. Int J Prosthodont 2012;25: 395-402.
8. van Dijken JW, Hasseirot L. A prospective 15-year evaluation of extensive dentin-enamel-bonding pressed ceramic coverages. Dent Mater 2010; 26: 929-939.
9. Guess PC, Selz CF, Steinhart YN, Stampf S, Strub JR. Prospective clinical split-mouth study of pressed and CAD/CAM all-ceramic partial-coverage restorations: 7 year results. Int J Prosthodont 2013;26:21-25.
10. Santos MJ, Mondelli RF, Navarro MF, Francischone CE, Rubo JH, Santos GC Jr. Clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays and onlays fabricated with two systems: five-year follow-up. Oper Dent 2013;38:3-11.
11. Freire Y, Gonzalo E, Lopez-Suarez C, Suarez MJ. The marginal fit of CAD-CAM monolithic ceramic and metal-ceramic crowns. J Prosthodont. 2017,doi: 10.1111/jopr.12590.
12. Borgia E, Baron R, Borgia JL. Clinical performance of bonded ceramic inlays/onlays: A 5- to 18-year retrospective longitudinal study. Am J Dent. 2016;29:187-192.
13. Rubinstein S, Nidetz A. The art and science of the direct posterior restoration: recreating form, color and translucency. Aloha Omegan 2007;100:30-35.
14. Illie N, Hickel R, Valceanu AS, et al. Fracture toughness of dental restorative materials. Clin Oral Investig. 2012,16:489-498.
15. Sripetchdanond J, Leevailoi C. Wear of human enamel opposing monolithic zirconia, glass ceramic and composite resin: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;112:1141-1150.
16. Belli R, Geinzer E, Muschweck A, et al. Mechanical fatigue degradation of ceramics versus resin composites for dental restorations. Dent Mater. 2014;30:424-432.
17. Perdigão J. Dentin bonding-variables related to the clinical situation and the substrate treatment. Dent Mater 2010;26:24-37.
18. Brackett MG, Li N, Brackett WW, et al. The critical barrier to progress in dentine bonding with the etch-and-rinse technique. J Dent 2011;39:238-248.
19. Liu Y, Tjäderhane L, Breschi L. et al. Limitations in bonding to dentin and experimental strategies to prevent bond degradation. J Dent Res. 2011;8:953-968.
20. Peumans M, De Munck J, Mine A. et al. Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives for the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions. A systematic review. Dent Mater. 2014;10:1089-1103
21. Ozer F, Blatz MB. Self-etch and etch-and-rinse adhesive systems in clinical dentistry. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2013;1:12-14.
22. Mahn E, Rousson V, Heintze S. Meta-Analysis of the influence of bonding parameters on clinical outcome of tooth-colored cervical restorations. J Adhes Dent. 2015;5:391-403.
23. Lynch CD, Frazier KB, McConnell RJ et al. Minimally invasive management of dental caries: contemporary teaching of posterior resin-based composite placement in U.S. and Canadian dental schools. J Am Dent Assoc. 2011;142:612-620.
24. Nascimento GG, Correa MB, Opdam N et al. Do clinical experience time and postgraduate training influence the choice of materials for posterior restorations? Results of a survey with Brazilian general dentists. Braz Dent J 2013;6:642-646.
25. Opdam NJ, van de Sande FH, Bronkhorst E, et al. Longevity of posterior composite restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res 2014;93:943-949.
26. Heinze SD, Rousson V. Clinical effectiveness of direct class II restorations-a metanalysis. J Adhes Dent 2012;14:407-431.
27. van Dijken JW, Pallessen U. A randomized 10-year prospective follow-up of Class II nanohybrid and conventional hybrid resin composite restorations. J Adhes Dent 2014;16:585-592.
28. da Rosa Rodolpho PA, Donassollo TA, Cenci MS, et al. 22-year clinical evaluation of the performance of two posterior composites with different filler characteristics. Dent Mater 2011;27:955-963.
29. van de Sande FH, Opdam NJ, Rodolpho PA, et al. Patient risk factors apos; influence on survival of posterior composites. J Dent Res 2013;92 (Suppl):78S-83S.
30. Laegreid T, Gjerdet NR, Johansson AK. Extensive composite molar restorations: 3 years clinical evaluation. Acta Odontol Scand 2012;70:344-352.
31. Beck F, Lettner S, Graf A, et al. Survival of direct resin restorations in posterior teeth within a 19-year period (1996-2015): A meta-analysis of prospective studies. Dent Mater. 2015;31:958-985.
32. Borgia E, Baron R, Borgia JL. Quality and survival of direct light-activated composite resin restorations in posterior teeth: A 5- to 20-year retrospective longitudinal study. J Prosthodont.2017 (ahead of print), doi: 10.1111/jopr.12630.
33. Patzer G. Understanding the causal relationship between physical atractiveness and self- esteem. J Esthet Dent 1996;3:144-147.
34. Bauer J, Vasilache I, Schlegel AK, et al. Esthetics and Psyque-Part 1: Assessment of the influence of patient apos; perceptions of body image and body experience on selection of existing natural tooth color. Int J Prosthodont 2012;25:36-43
35. Witt M, Flores-Mir C. Laypeople preferences regarding frontal dentofacial esthetics: periodontal factors. J Am Dent Assoc 2011;142:925-937.
36. Gul-e-Erum, Fida M.- Changes in smile parameters as perceived by orthodontists, dentists, artists, and laypeople. World J Orthod. 2008;9:132-140
37. Borgia E, Barón R, Borgia, J L. Cast posts: a forty-four year retrospective clinical study in a specialized private practice. Odontoestomatología 2015;25: 11-22. Available from: http://www.scielo.edu.uy/pdf/ode/v17n25/en_v17n25a03.pdf
38. Borgia E, Barón R, Borgia JL. Endocrowns: A retrospective patient series study, in a 8 to 19-year period. Odontoestomatología; 2016;28: 45-59. Available from: http://www.scielo.edu.uy/pdf/ode/v18n28/en_v18n28a07.pdf
39. The Glossary of Prosthodontic Term. J Prosthet Dent. 2005; 1:10-85.
40. Ryge G. Clinical criteria. Int Dent J 1980;30:347-358.
41. Axelsson P, Lindhe J. Effect of controlled oral hygiene procedures on caries and periodontal disease in adults. Results after 6 years. J Clin Periodontol 1981;3:239-248.
42. Krasse Bo. Caries Risk: A practical guide for assessment and control. Introduction to Chapter 14. Quintessence Publishing, Chicago,Illinois, 1985:11-96.
43. Emilson CG. Effect of chlorhexidine gel treatment on Streptococcus mutans population in human saliva and dental plaque. Scand J Dent Res 1981; 89:239-246.
44. Maltz M, Zickert I, Krasse B. Effect of intensive treatment with chlorhexidine on number of Streptococcus mutans in saliva. Scand J Dent Res 1981; 89:445-449.
45. Fisher DW, Morgan WW. Modification and preservation of existing dental restorations. Chicago: Quintessence, 1987; Chapter 1:15-28
46. Kois DE, Isvilanonda V, Chaiyabutr Y, Kois JC. Evaluation of fracture resistance and failure risks of posterior partial coverage restorations. J Esthet Rest Dent, 2013;25:110-122.
47. Laegreid T, Gjerdet NR, Johansson A, Johansson A-K. Clinical decision making on extensive molar restorations. Oper Dent 2014;6:231-240.
48. Frankenberger R, Reinelt C, Petschelt A, Krämer N. Operator vs. material influence on clinical outcome of bonded ceramic inlays. Dent Mater 2009;25:960-968.
49. Borgia E. On Knowledge Update in Planning Comprehensive Dental Treatment: A Personal Overview. Int J Prosthodont. 2017;1:11-12.
2. Demarco FF, Corrêa MB, Cenci MS, et al. Longevity of posterior composite restorations: Not only a matter of materials. Dent Mater 2012;28:87-101.
3. Stoll R, Sieweke M, Pieper K, Stachniss V, Schulte A. Longevity of cast gold inlays and partial crowns--a retrospective study at a dental school. Clin Oral Investig. 1999;2:100-104.
4. Studer SP, Wettstein F, Lehner C, Zullo TG, Schärer P. Long-term survival estimates of cast gold inlays and onlays with their analysis of failures. J Oral Rehabil. 2000;6:461-472.
5. Donovan T.E., Chee W.W.- Conservative indirect restorations for posterior teeth. Cast versus bonded ceramic. Dent Clin North Am. 1993;3:433-443.
6. Donovan T., Simonsen R.J., Guertin G., Tucker R.V.- Retrospective clinical evaluation of 1314 cast gold restorations in service from 1 to 52 years. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2004;3:194-204.
7. Beier US, Kapferer I, Burtscher D, GIesinger JM, Dumfahrt H. Clinical performance of all-ceramic inlay and onlay restorations in posterior teeth. Int J Prosthodont 2012;25: 395-402.
8. van Dijken JW, Hasseirot L. A prospective 15-year evaluation of extensive dentin-enamel-bonding pressed ceramic coverages. Dent Mater 2010; 26: 929-939.
9. Guess PC, Selz CF, Steinhart YN, Stampf S, Strub JR. Prospective clinical split-mouth study of pressed and CAD/CAM all-ceramic partial-coverage restorations: 7 year results. Int J Prosthodont 2013;26:21-25.
10. Santos MJ, Mondelli RF, Navarro MF, Francischone CE, Rubo JH, Santos GC Jr. Clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays and onlays fabricated with two systems: five-year follow-up. Oper Dent 2013;38:3-11.
11. Freire Y, Gonzalo E, Lopez-Suarez C, Suarez MJ. The marginal fit of CAD-CAM monolithic ceramic and metal-ceramic crowns. J Prosthodont. 2017,doi: 10.1111/jopr.12590.
12. Borgia E, Baron R, Borgia JL. Clinical performance of bonded ceramic inlays/onlays: A 5- to 18-year retrospective longitudinal study. Am J Dent. 2016;29:187-192.
13. Rubinstein S, Nidetz A. The art and science of the direct posterior restoration: recreating form, color and translucency. Aloha Omegan 2007;100:30-35.
14. Illie N, Hickel R, Valceanu AS, et al. Fracture toughness of dental restorative materials. Clin Oral Investig. 2012,16:489-498.
15. Sripetchdanond J, Leevailoi C. Wear of human enamel opposing monolithic zirconia, glass ceramic and composite resin: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;112:1141-1150.
16. Belli R, Geinzer E, Muschweck A, et al. Mechanical fatigue degradation of ceramics versus resin composites for dental restorations. Dent Mater. 2014;30:424-432.
17. Perdigão J. Dentin bonding-variables related to the clinical situation and the substrate treatment. Dent Mater 2010;26:24-37.
18. Brackett MG, Li N, Brackett WW, et al. The critical barrier to progress in dentine bonding with the etch-and-rinse technique. J Dent 2011;39:238-248.
19. Liu Y, Tjäderhane L, Breschi L. et al. Limitations in bonding to dentin and experimental strategies to prevent bond degradation. J Dent Res. 2011;8:953-968.
20. Peumans M, De Munck J, Mine A. et al. Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives for the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions. A systematic review. Dent Mater. 2014;10:1089-1103
21. Ozer F, Blatz MB. Self-etch and etch-and-rinse adhesive systems in clinical dentistry. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2013;1:12-14.
22. Mahn E, Rousson V, Heintze S. Meta-Analysis of the influence of bonding parameters on clinical outcome of tooth-colored cervical restorations. J Adhes Dent. 2015;5:391-403.
23. Lynch CD, Frazier KB, McConnell RJ et al. Minimally invasive management of dental caries: contemporary teaching of posterior resin-based composite placement in U.S. and Canadian dental schools. J Am Dent Assoc. 2011;142:612-620.
24. Nascimento GG, Correa MB, Opdam N et al. Do clinical experience time and postgraduate training influence the choice of materials for posterior restorations? Results of a survey with Brazilian general dentists. Braz Dent J 2013;6:642-646.
25. Opdam NJ, van de Sande FH, Bronkhorst E, et al. Longevity of posterior composite restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res 2014;93:943-949.
26. Heinze SD, Rousson V. Clinical effectiveness of direct class II restorations-a metanalysis. J Adhes Dent 2012;14:407-431.
27. van Dijken JW, Pallessen U. A randomized 10-year prospective follow-up of Class II nanohybrid and conventional hybrid resin composite restorations. J Adhes Dent 2014;16:585-592.
28. da Rosa Rodolpho PA, Donassollo TA, Cenci MS, et al. 22-year clinical evaluation of the performance of two posterior composites with different filler characteristics. Dent Mater 2011;27:955-963.
29. van de Sande FH, Opdam NJ, Rodolpho PA, et al. Patient risk factors apos; influence on survival of posterior composites. J Dent Res 2013;92 (Suppl):78S-83S.
30. Laegreid T, Gjerdet NR, Johansson AK. Extensive composite molar restorations: 3 years clinical evaluation. Acta Odontol Scand 2012;70:344-352.
31. Beck F, Lettner S, Graf A, et al. Survival of direct resin restorations in posterior teeth within a 19-year period (1996-2015): A meta-analysis of prospective studies. Dent Mater. 2015;31:958-985.
32. Borgia E, Baron R, Borgia JL. Quality and survival of direct light-activated composite resin restorations in posterior teeth: A 5- to 20-year retrospective longitudinal study. J Prosthodont.2017 (ahead of print), doi: 10.1111/jopr.12630.
33. Patzer G. Understanding the causal relationship between physical atractiveness and self- esteem. J Esthet Dent 1996;3:144-147.
34. Bauer J, Vasilache I, Schlegel AK, et al. Esthetics and Psyque-Part 1: Assessment of the influence of patient apos; perceptions of body image and body experience on selection of existing natural tooth color. Int J Prosthodont 2012;25:36-43
35. Witt M, Flores-Mir C. Laypeople preferences regarding frontal dentofacial esthetics: periodontal factors. J Am Dent Assoc 2011;142:925-937.
36. Gul-e-Erum, Fida M.- Changes in smile parameters as perceived by orthodontists, dentists, artists, and laypeople. World J Orthod. 2008;9:132-140
37. Borgia E, Barón R, Borgia, J L. Cast posts: a forty-four year retrospective clinical study in a specialized private practice. Odontoestomatología 2015;25: 11-22. Available from: http://www.scielo.edu.uy/pdf/ode/v17n25/en_v17n25a03.pdf
38. Borgia E, Barón R, Borgia JL. Endocrowns: A retrospective patient series study, in a 8 to 19-year period. Odontoestomatología; 2016;28: 45-59. Available from: http://www.scielo.edu.uy/pdf/ode/v18n28/en_v18n28a07.pdf
39. The Glossary of Prosthodontic Term. J Prosthet Dent. 2005; 1:10-85.
40. Ryge G. Clinical criteria. Int Dent J 1980;30:347-358.
41. Axelsson P, Lindhe J. Effect of controlled oral hygiene procedures on caries and periodontal disease in adults. Results after 6 years. J Clin Periodontol 1981;3:239-248.
42. Krasse Bo. Caries Risk: A practical guide for assessment and control. Introduction to Chapter 14. Quintessence Publishing, Chicago,Illinois, 1985:11-96.
43. Emilson CG. Effect of chlorhexidine gel treatment on Streptococcus mutans population in human saliva and dental plaque. Scand J Dent Res 1981; 89:239-246.
44. Maltz M, Zickert I, Krasse B. Effect of intensive treatment with chlorhexidine on number of Streptococcus mutans in saliva. Scand J Dent Res 1981; 89:445-449.
45. Fisher DW, Morgan WW. Modification and preservation of existing dental restorations. Chicago: Quintessence, 1987; Chapter 1:15-28
46. Kois DE, Isvilanonda V, Chaiyabutr Y, Kois JC. Evaluation of fracture resistance and failure risks of posterior partial coverage restorations. J Esthet Rest Dent, 2013;25:110-122.
47. Laegreid T, Gjerdet NR, Johansson A, Johansson A-K. Clinical decision making on extensive molar restorations. Oper Dent 2014;6:231-240.
48. Frankenberger R, Reinelt C, Petschelt A, Krämer N. Operator vs. material influence on clinical outcome of bonded ceramic inlays. Dent Mater 2009;25:960-968.
49. Borgia E. On Knowledge Update in Planning Comprehensive Dental Treatment: A Personal Overview. Int J Prosthodont. 2017;1:11-12.