Keywords
chlorhexidine, microtensile, metalloproteinases, hybrid layer.
How to Cite
Human dentin bond strength of chlorhexidine containing universal adhesive system used in total-etch and self-etch modes. (2020). Odontoestomatología, 22(35), 20-29. https://doi.org/10.22592/10.22592/ode2020n35a4
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the microtensile
bond strength to human dentin of
chlorhexidine containing universal adhesive
system applied in the total-etch and selfetch
modes.
Methods: Twenty third molars were
randomly divided into four groups
according to the universal adhesive system
(Single Bond Universal ®, 3M ESPE and
Peak Universal Bond®, Ultradent) and
application mode used (total-etch and
self-etch). Specimens were prepared and
subjected to a microtensile bond strength
using a MTS SANS universal testing
machine.
Results: No statistically significant
differences were found in the microtensile
bond strength between the four groups
studied.
Conclusions: The bond strength of a
composite resin to human dentin was
not affected by the use of a universal
adhesive system with chlorhexidine in its
composition applied in the total-etch and
self-etch modes.
References
1. Correa MB, Peres MA, Peres KG, Horta BL,
Barros AD, Demarco FF. Amalgam or composite
resin? Factors influencing the choice of restorative
material. J Dent. 2012; 40 (9): 703-10.
2. Bedran-Russo A, Leme-Kraus AA, Vidal CMP,
Teixeira EC. An Overview of Dental Adhesive
Systems and the Dynamic Tooth-Adhesive Interface.
Dent Clin North Am. 2017; 61 (4):
713-731.
3. Sofan E, Sofan A, Palaia G, Tenore G, Romeo
U, Migliau G. Classification review of dental
adhesive systems: from the IV generation to the
universal type. Ann Stomatol (Roma). 2017; 8
(1):1-17.
4. Tsujimoto A, Iwasa M, Shimamura Y, Murayama
R, Takamizawa T, Miyazaki M. Enamel
bonding of single-step self-etch adhesives: Influence
of surface energy characteristics. J Dent.
2010; 38 (2):123–30.
5. Mandri MN, Aguirre Grabre de Prieto A, Zamudio
ME. Sistemas adhesivos en Odontología
Restauradora. Odon. 2015; 17 (26): 50–6.
6. Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Poitevin A,
Mine A, Van Ende A, Neves A, De Munck J.
Relationship between bond-strength tests and
clinical outcomes. Dent Mater. 2010; 26 (2):
100–21.
7. Atash Biz Yeganeh L, Seyed Tabai E, MohammadiBasir
M. Bonding Durability of Four Adhesive
Systems. J Dent (Tehran). 2015; 12 (8):
563–70.
8. Dourado Loguercio A, Reis A. Sistemas Adhesivos.
RevOperDent y BiomaterDent y Biomater.
2006; 1 (2): 13-28
9. Hernández JM. Aspectos prácticos de la adhesión
a dentina Practicalaspects in dentinaladhesion.
Av. Odontoestomatol. 2004; 20 (1):
19–32.
10. Ceballos L, Camejo DG, Victoria Fuentes M,
Osorio R, Toledano M, Carvalho RM, Pashley
DH. Microtensile bond strength of total-etch
and self-etching adhesives to caries-affected
dentine. J Dent. 2003; 31 (7): 469–77.
11. Carrilho MR, Geraldeli S, Tay F, de Goes MF,
Carvalho RM, Tjäderhane L, Reis AF, Hebling
J, Mazzoni A, Breschi L, Pashley. In vivo preservation
of the hybrid layer by chlorhexidine. J
Dent Res. 2007; 86 (6): 529–33.
12. Oliveira SSA, Pugach MK, Hilton JF, Watanabe
LG, Marshall SJ, Marshall GW. The influence
of the dentin smear layer on adhesion: A selfetching
primer vs. a total-etch system. Dent
Mater. 2003; 19 (8): 758-67.
13. Scherrer SS, Cesar PF, Swain M V. Direct comparison
of the bond strength results of the different
test methods: a critical literature review.
Dent Mater. 2010; 26 (2): e78-93.
14. Bader Mattar M, Ibáñez Musalem M. Evaluación
de la interfase adhesiva obtenida en restauraciones
de resina compuesta realizadas con un
sistema adhesivo universal utilizado con y sin
grabado ácido previo. Rev Clínica Periodoncia,
Implantol y Rehabil Oral. 2014; 7 (3): 115–22.
15. Pomacóndor-Hernández C. Papel de la clorhexidina
en la odontología restauradora. Odontol
San Maquina. 2010; 13 (2): 46–9.
16. Tekçe N, Tuncer S, Demirci M, Balci S. Do matrix
metalloproteinase inhibitors improve the
bond durability of universal dental adhesives?
Scanning. 2016; 38 (6): 535–44.
17. Vola J. Influencia de los inhibidores de las metaloproteinasas,
agentes reticuladores y remineralizaciónbiomimética
en la longevidad de
la unión adhesiva. Actas Odon. 2014; 11 (2):
10–21.
18. Pashley DH, Carvalho RM, Sano H, Nakajima
M, Yoshiyama M, Shono Y, Fernandes CA, Tay
F. The microtensilebond test: a review. J Adhes
Dent. 1999; 1 (4): 299–309.
19. International Organization for Standarization.
ISO 4049:2009 Dentistry Polymer based restorative
materials. 2009.
20. Leite ML de A e. S, Costa CA de S, Duarte RM,
de Andrade AKM, Soares DG. Bond strength
and cytotoxicity of a universal adhesive according
to the hybridization strategies to dentin.
Braz Dent J. 2018; 29 (1): 68-75.
21. Muñoz MA, Luque I, Hass V, Reis A, Loguercio
AD, Bombarda NHC. Immediate bonding
properties of universal adhesives to dentine. J
Dent. 2013; 41 (5): 404-11.
22. Sanchez F, Osorio R, Toledano M. Control del
colapso del colágeno: sistemas autograbadores.
Av. Odontoestomatol. 2004; 20 (4): 175–83.
23. Parra Lozada M, Rayo HG. Sistemas adhesivos
autograbadores, resistencia de unión y nanofiltración:
una revisión self-etchingadhesivesystems,
bond strength and nanofiltration: a review.
Rev Fac Odontol Univ Antioquia. 2012;
24 (24): 133-150.
24. Roopa D ARS, D R. por Roopa D; Rao A.
Comparative Evaluation of the Bonding Efficacy
of Seventh Generation Bonding Agent and
Peak Universal Bond: An In-Vitro Study. JBR J
Interdiscip Med Dent Sci. 2015; 03 (02): 1–4.
Barros AD, Demarco FF. Amalgam or composite
resin? Factors influencing the choice of restorative
material. J Dent. 2012; 40 (9): 703-10.
2. Bedran-Russo A, Leme-Kraus AA, Vidal CMP,
Teixeira EC. An Overview of Dental Adhesive
Systems and the Dynamic Tooth-Adhesive Interface.
Dent Clin North Am. 2017; 61 (4):
713-731.
3. Sofan E, Sofan A, Palaia G, Tenore G, Romeo
U, Migliau G. Classification review of dental
adhesive systems: from the IV generation to the
universal type. Ann Stomatol (Roma). 2017; 8
(1):1-17.
4. Tsujimoto A, Iwasa M, Shimamura Y, Murayama
R, Takamizawa T, Miyazaki M. Enamel
bonding of single-step self-etch adhesives: Influence
of surface energy characteristics. J Dent.
2010; 38 (2):123–30.
5. Mandri MN, Aguirre Grabre de Prieto A, Zamudio
ME. Sistemas adhesivos en Odontología
Restauradora. Odon. 2015; 17 (26): 50–6.
6. Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Poitevin A,
Mine A, Van Ende A, Neves A, De Munck J.
Relationship between bond-strength tests and
clinical outcomes. Dent Mater. 2010; 26 (2):
100–21.
7. Atash Biz Yeganeh L, Seyed Tabai E, MohammadiBasir
M. Bonding Durability of Four Adhesive
Systems. J Dent (Tehran). 2015; 12 (8):
563–70.
8. Dourado Loguercio A, Reis A. Sistemas Adhesivos.
RevOperDent y BiomaterDent y Biomater.
2006; 1 (2): 13-28
9. Hernández JM. Aspectos prácticos de la adhesión
a dentina Practicalaspects in dentinaladhesion.
Av. Odontoestomatol. 2004; 20 (1):
19–32.
10. Ceballos L, Camejo DG, Victoria Fuentes M,
Osorio R, Toledano M, Carvalho RM, Pashley
DH. Microtensile bond strength of total-etch
and self-etching adhesives to caries-affected
dentine. J Dent. 2003; 31 (7): 469–77.
11. Carrilho MR, Geraldeli S, Tay F, de Goes MF,
Carvalho RM, Tjäderhane L, Reis AF, Hebling
J, Mazzoni A, Breschi L, Pashley. In vivo preservation
of the hybrid layer by chlorhexidine. J
Dent Res. 2007; 86 (6): 529–33.
12. Oliveira SSA, Pugach MK, Hilton JF, Watanabe
LG, Marshall SJ, Marshall GW. The influence
of the dentin smear layer on adhesion: A selfetching
primer vs. a total-etch system. Dent
Mater. 2003; 19 (8): 758-67.
13. Scherrer SS, Cesar PF, Swain M V. Direct comparison
of the bond strength results of the different
test methods: a critical literature review.
Dent Mater. 2010; 26 (2): e78-93.
14. Bader Mattar M, Ibáñez Musalem M. Evaluación
de la interfase adhesiva obtenida en restauraciones
de resina compuesta realizadas con un
sistema adhesivo universal utilizado con y sin
grabado ácido previo. Rev Clínica Periodoncia,
Implantol y Rehabil Oral. 2014; 7 (3): 115–22.
15. Pomacóndor-Hernández C. Papel de la clorhexidina
en la odontología restauradora. Odontol
San Maquina. 2010; 13 (2): 46–9.
16. Tekçe N, Tuncer S, Demirci M, Balci S. Do matrix
metalloproteinase inhibitors improve the
bond durability of universal dental adhesives?
Scanning. 2016; 38 (6): 535–44.
17. Vola J. Influencia de los inhibidores de las metaloproteinasas,
agentes reticuladores y remineralizaciónbiomimética
en la longevidad de
la unión adhesiva. Actas Odon. 2014; 11 (2):
10–21.
18. Pashley DH, Carvalho RM, Sano H, Nakajima
M, Yoshiyama M, Shono Y, Fernandes CA, Tay
F. The microtensilebond test: a review. J Adhes
Dent. 1999; 1 (4): 299–309.
19. International Organization for Standarization.
ISO 4049:2009 Dentistry Polymer based restorative
materials. 2009.
20. Leite ML de A e. S, Costa CA de S, Duarte RM,
de Andrade AKM, Soares DG. Bond strength
and cytotoxicity of a universal adhesive according
to the hybridization strategies to dentin.
Braz Dent J. 2018; 29 (1): 68-75.
21. Muñoz MA, Luque I, Hass V, Reis A, Loguercio
AD, Bombarda NHC. Immediate bonding
properties of universal adhesives to dentine. J
Dent. 2013; 41 (5): 404-11.
22. Sanchez F, Osorio R, Toledano M. Control del
colapso del colágeno: sistemas autograbadores.
Av. Odontoestomatol. 2004; 20 (4): 175–83.
23. Parra Lozada M, Rayo HG. Sistemas adhesivos
autograbadores, resistencia de unión y nanofiltración:
una revisión self-etchingadhesivesystems,
bond strength and nanofiltration: a review.
Rev Fac Odontol Univ Antioquia. 2012;
24 (24): 133-150.
24. Roopa D ARS, D R. por Roopa D; Rao A.
Comparative Evaluation of the Bonding Efficacy
of Seventh Generation Bonding Agent and
Peak Universal Bond: An In-Vitro Study. JBR J
Interdiscip Med Dent Sci. 2015; 03 (02): 1–4.